Ultima Thule

In ancient times the northernmost region of the habitable world - hence, any distant, unknown or mysterious land.

Wednesday, July 26, 2006

Iran to Nuke Israel on August 22?

By Aussiegirl

Let's hope this isn't true. Dates and anniversaries are very important to these fanatical Muslims. Considering that Ahmadinejad truly believes in the coming of the Mahdi (currently living in a well), who will only return when the world is in bloody chaos, this could very well be part of the plan. As I said before, I hope I'm wrong, but I just have a sickening gut feeling that Iran has not just blundered into this war accidentally, but is acting on its own predetermined schedule. If that's true, then Ahmadinejad must have an end game, and a big surprise beyond kidnapping a few soldiers and engaging Israel in a border skirmish. If he really is making his first deliberate moves, he's got something even bigger planned when the time is right. I sure hope I'm wrong.

HUMAN EVENTS ONLINE - Iran to Nuke Israel on August 22? by Robert Spencer

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has frustrated Western officials by refusing to reply to their offer of various incentives in exchange for Iran’s discarding its nuclear program until August 22. The Western governments had asked Ahmadinejad to reply by June 29; why would Tehran need two extra months?

Farid Ghadry, the president of the Reform Party of Syria, has offered a provocative explanation for this delay. He asserts that the Supreme National Security Council of Iran chose the August 22 date “for a very precise reason. August 21, 2006 (Rajab 27, 1427) is known in the Islamic calendar as the Night of the Sira’a and Miira’aj, the night Prophet Mohammed (saas) ascended to heaven from the Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem on a Bourak (Half animal, half man), while a great light lit-up the night sky, and visited Heaven and Hell also Beit al-Saada and Beit al-Shaqaa (House of Happiness and House of Misery) and then descended back to Mecca.…”

The Night Journey, or Miraj, is central to Islam’s claim to Jerusalem as an Islamic holy city. According to Islamic tradition, Muhammad was carried on a Buraq, a miraculous horse with a human head, from Mecca to Jerusalem, where he ascended into heaven and met the other prophets. The only thing the Qur’an has to say about it is this: “Glory to (Allah) Who did take His servant for a Journey by night from the Sacred Mosque to the farthest Mosque, whose precincts We did bless, in order that We might show him some of Our Signs: for He is the One Who heareth and seeth (all things)” (17:1). There is no identification of the “farthest Mosque” with any mosque in Jerusalem in this, but the Hadith is very clear on the identification of its location with Jerusalem.

The traditions say that Muhammad and the Buraq, along with the angel Gabriel, went to the Temple Mount, and from there to heaven itself, where Muhammad encountered various prophets. In the sixth heaven was Moses, occasioning a dig at the Jews. “When I left him,” Muhammad says, “he wept. Someone asked him, ‘What makes you weep?’ Moses said, ‘I weep because after me there has been sent (Muhammad as a Prophet) a young man, whose followers will enter Paradise in greater numbers than my followers.’”

Evidently, however, Muhammad’s stories of his journey were not altogether convincing: some Muslims even abandoned Islam. Did he really go anywhere? According to his favorite wife, Aisha, he didn’t: “The apostle’s body remained where it was but God removed his spirit by night.” Nevertheless, the Night Journey has become firmly embedded in the Islamic consciousness, such that Muslims today celebrate it as one of the central events of Muhammad’s life. And now, according to Ghadry, Ahmadinejad is planning an illumination of the night sky over Jerusalem to rival the one that greeted the Prophet of Islam on his journey. What the Iranian President, he says, is “promising the world by August 22 is the light in the sky over the Aqsa Mosque that took place the night before. That is his answer to the package of incentives the international community offered Iran on June 6.”

Certainly a nuclear attack on Jerusalem or even an all-out conventional assault against Israel by Iran would be consistent with Ahmadinejad’s oft-repeated denials of Israel’s right to exist and recent predictions that its demise was at hand. He hinted at the use of nuclear weapons in his phrasing when he said that Israel “pushed the button of its own destruction” by finally retaliating against Hizballah’s relentless rocket barrage from south Lebanon.

“Arrogant powers,” Ahmadinejad said, “have set up a base for themselves to threaten and plunder nations in the region. But today, the occupier regime” -- that is, Israel -- “whose philosophy is based on threats, massacre and invasion, has reached its finishing line.”

Will he attempt to make good on these threats this year on the anniversary of the Miraj, illuminating the night sky over Jerusalem? Will Western powers heed Farid Ghadry’s words and move to stop Iran before it is too late?


At 9:57 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Definitely something to consider. Surely, if it was suspected that Ahmadinejad was close to nuking Israel, Israel itself, or one of its close allies (USA or Britain) would preemptively strike the Iranians. That's also a scary thought. Striking Iran would further isolate USA/Britain from China and Russia, both countries which court Iran for energy resources.
Interesting article. Thanks for posting it.

At 2:46 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...


Iran isn't going to nuke Israel because that would be suicide. Extremism in the Islamic world is known to encourage what they call "martyrdom", but it's always directed toward the lower ranks - those poor bastards with nothing to lose. When did you last see a leader of a terrorist group committing "martyrdom" for his cause? Never. This is because they're not that damn stupid.

Neither Ahmadinejad, nor those who control him, would escape total destruction if they nuke Israel any time soon. Hence, it won't happen.

On the other hand, Iran's aim to attain WMD is unsettling because of their undeniable ties to terrorism.


Post a Comment

<< Home