Subsidizing the Enemy
By Aussiegirl
The British just don't get it. What's so hard to understand about the phrase "the enemy within"? Pipes's last sentence says it all: Thus does the enemy’s infrastructure build in our midst.
FrontPage magazine.com :: Subsidizing the Enemy by Daniel Pipes
An Islamic school in London is teaching that non-Muslims are akin to pigs and dogs, and it is doing so with subventions from the British taxpayer. More alarmingly, when notified of this problem, the British authorities indicate they intend to do nothing about it.
The Times (London) reported on April 20 in “Muslim students ‘being taught to despise unbelievers as ‘filth’,” that the Hawza Ilmiyya, a Shi‘i institution, teaches from the writings of Muhaqqiq al-Hilli. This scholar lived from 1240 to 1326 and wrote the authoritative work on Shi‘i law (Shara’i‘ al-Islam). About non-believers, called kafirs, he taught:
The water left over in the container after any type of animal has drunk from it is considered clean and pure apart from the left over of a dog, a pig, and a disbeliever.
There are ten types of filth and impurities: urine, faeces, semen, carrion, blood of carrion, dogs, pigs, disbelievers.
When a dog, a pig, or a disbeliever touches or comes in contact with the clothes or body [of a Muslim] while he [the disbeliever] is wet, it becomes obligatory-compulsory upon him [the Muslim] to wash and clean that part which came in contact with the disbeliever.
In addition, a chapter on jihad specifies conditions under which Muslims should fight Jews and Christians. [....]
One can only assume that the Hawza Ilmiyya will go on its merry way, undeterred by the pleas for help by its students, the exposure of its practices, questions raised in parliament, and the complaints of citizens, and it will also continue to enjoy its 28 percent Gift Aid. Thus does the enemy’s infrastructure build in our midst.
posted by Aussiegirl @ 11:16 AM
1 Comments:
It is very puzzling. It's almost some kind of kamikaze genetic structure in the British psyche.
I was just reading a paper on Canadian history in the 1910s that is sort of the flip side of this situation, but two sides of the same coin.
In 1916, Canadians abolished bilingual schools for new immigrants from Eastern Europe because they perceived such schools somehow threatened the English language and British makeup of Canadian society and culture. This was despite assurances and even clear evidence that Ukrainians and other immigrants were loyal Canadians, and wanted desperately to learn and adapt English and Canadian ways. They just wanted to do it in a language they understood!
So, 100 years ago, Brit types in the colonies refused to grant subordinate language rights to immigrants who were eager to integrate into the dominant society. And today Brits in their own country are eager to subordinate their society to immigrants who not only don't want to integrate, but who want to annihilate and dominate their culture.
Go figure.
Post a Comment
<< Home