Universe in Flux: Constant of nature might have changed

By Aussiegirl

Constants of nature are dropping like flies! First the fine structure constant seems to have changed (see my recent post, Atomic force weaker than thought). I had barely enough time to assimilate this blockbuster, when -- are you ready for this? -- it looks like, to quote from the article, the ratio between the mass of the proton and that of the electron—a number known as mu—might have decreased by about two-thousandths of a percent in the past 12 billion years.
But don't just take my word for this second blockbuster. Here's another quote: "If correct, it is a revolutionary result," comments Victor V. Flambaum of the University of New South Wales in Sydney, Australia. "It doesn't matter that the variation is small. If mu varies, we need new theoretical physics and cosmology."
I look forward with some trepidation to the next shocker coming my way.

Universe in Flux: Constant of nature might have changed: Science News Online, April 29, 2006

Universe in Flux: Constant of nature might have changed
Peter Weiss

Scientists have long assumed that a few characteristics of the cosmos are as unvarying as the laws of physics themselves. These so-called constants of nature include the speed of light in a vacuum and the masses of some elementary particles.

Now, a team of physicists and astronomers in the Netherlands, Russia, and France has found signs that one of the constants has undergone a subtle shift since the infancy of the universe.

The new findings indicate that the ratio between the mass of the proton and that of the electron—a number known as mu—might have decreased by about two-thousandths of a percent in the past 12 billion years, say Elmar Reinhold, now of the European Space Agency in Noordwijk, the Netherlands, and his colleagues. The evidence for the change in the constant, which has a current value of 1,836.153, emerged from light-absorption patterns of hydrogen molecules, the scientists report in the April 21 Physical Review Letters.

"If correct, it is a revolutionary result," comments Victor V. Flambaum of the University of New South Wales in Sydney, Australia. "It doesn't matter that the variation is small. If mu varies, we need new theoretical physics and cosmology."

Flambaum notes that variations in constants of nature as the cosmos evolves are part of some speculative theories of the universe, such as string theory, that call for dimensions beyond the familiar three of space plus one of time. [....]

Meanwhile, Reinhold and other members of the team, led by Wim Ubachs of the Free University of Amsterdam, determined with unprecedented accuracy the wavelengths of light that hydrogen molecules absorb from laser beams in the laboratory today, 13.7 billion years after the Big Bang.

The scientists found the wavelengths to be slightly different in the two sets of data. Because the wavelengths that hydrogen molecules absorb depend on the value of mu, the results suggest that mu has changed.

Nonetheless, the absorption evidence gathered so far from two quasars isn't strong enough to prove that mu varies, say members of the team and other scientists.

Investigators studying alpha have looked at 143 quasar systems, yet the notion that alpha has varied remains controversial, notes Michael T. Murphy of the University of Cambridge in England, one of the scientists who, with Flambaum, reported the alpha variation.

Scientists "need absolutely cast-iron proof" beyond the current study because the implications are so profound, agrees Lennox L. Cowie of the University of Hawaii, Manoa in Honolulu.

.